Hardly a "duh" moment at all. Good catch! Wing On 1/2/08, Richard Hartman <seasoft at west.net> wrote: > For those of you with interest in this goat rope, there has been a > development that isn't surprising in hindsight; in fact most of you > will simply think "well, duh!" But, for any other noobs struggling to > make sense of it all, consider this: > > I was having sporadic & bizarre trouble with DVD burns on my "system > #2" MacBookPro (see below; running Leopard) and after much > troubleshooting, tracked the problem down to some errant system & > plist files. > > The MBPro Leopard had been a clean install, not an upgrade, but it > got a "migration assist" from my existing Tiger system. On the > suspicion that the migration might have caused other issues, I erased > & re-installed & updated Leopard on the MBPro, AND installed every > necessary piece of software from scratch (i.e., NO migration). > > Lo and behold, finder copies of the kind that formerly went at 25 > megabits per second are now shooting across at full speed (100 mbps). > > So, although there was no indication in my console or system logs > that anything was awry before the reinstall, in fact that pesky > migration assistant evidently produced some sort of havoc. The Finder > now copies as fast as rsync. > > Moral, for me: Never, ever use migration assistant for major system > upgrades; it oughta be a law... > > Richard > > On Dec 27, 2007, at 11:49 AM, Richard Hartman wrote: > > > Thanks to Wing Wong, Nick Scalise, David Ledger and Brian Medley > > for their thoughtful responses. For some reason, Wing Wong's > > detailed response didn't make it to the list and is reproduced > > (far) below. > > > > Here is a summary of what I learned: > > > > The overhead on my setup of mounting a volume on the desktop (via > > AFP) is evidently enormous: > > > > - Mounting a LAN volume on the local desktop and then using cp on a > > large (2GB) file using a terminal window (copying from mounted LAN > > volume to internal disk drive) produced transfer rates of only > > about 25 megabits/sec. > > > > - Unmounting the LAN volume and instead using scp or rsync (and the > > IP address of the source mac) produced the expected transfer rate > > of 100 megabits/sec, which was the speed limit expected by the > > slowest network element in the loop (the 100 mbps nic on one of the > > macs). > > > > Regards, > > > > Rich > > > >> On Dec 26, 2007 1:54 PM, Richard Hartman < seasoft at west.net> wrote: > >> I'm looking for guidance on how best to copy large data sets between > >> macs on a network (Finder, terminal cp, other?). > >> > >> The setup: Copying from mac #1 (a 2006 iMac running 10.4.11 with > >> built-in 100bps ethernet) to mac #2 (a recent PBPro running 10.5.1 > >> with built-in Gigabit ethernet). Macs connected by a Gigabit netgear > >> switch. > >> > >> I had hoped to get sustained transfers between these two macs of > >> 50-70 mbps (throttled by the rate-limiting 100 mbps iMac capability). > >> > >> However, copying a single 2 GByte file, by mounting the (Tiger) imac > >> on the (Leopard) MBPro desktop and using terminal "cp" command from > >> the MBPro terminal, results in a sustained transfer rate of only > >> about 2.5 mB/sec (25 mbps). > >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > X-Unix mailing list > X-Unix at listserver.themacintoshguy.com > http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/x-unix > -- Wing Wong wingedpower at gmail.com