On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 01:41:05AM -0700, James S Jones wrote: : : On Aug 10, 2004, at 1:05 AM, Eugene Lee wrote: : : >I doubt it. I think it's a simple case based on what Judi reported. : >She is doing a 10.3.3-to-10.3.5 upgrade. The smaller updater works : >only for 10.3.4-to-10.3.5, while the larger combo updater handles all : >previous versions of Panther. : : It seems like there are customizations beyond that. On my G4-upgraded : B&W, Software Update offers a 22.9 MB file. On my PowerBook, it offered : a 27 MB file. And, the web download (Standalone Installer) is 43 MB. : The originator of this thread, Spoonbender, reported using Software : Update and that the file offered was the full 43 MB. So, there must be : some differentiation in the update based on what Software Update finds : on the local machine. I think the considerable pause before reporting : what updates are available is additional evidence in support of this : theory. Moreover, Apple say as much, here: Just a footnote. I think the 10.3.4-to-10.3.5 updater is 43 MB. The 10.3.x-to-10.3.5 combo updater is over 82 MB. : <http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=25799> While the file sizes are going to throw lots of Mac support groups into a tissy fit because everyone is going to report different numbers, the idea is a good one. I especially liked this bit from the above article: Why are some computers not offered a smaller update? Not every computer that has Mac OS X 10.3.4 or later can benefit from smaller Software Updates. Why? Sometimes, modifications made to Mac OS X system files, including ones made by third-party products, may require the installation of a full sized version of a Mac OS X software update. Again, you don't have to worry about figuring out which kind of update is best for you, just let Software Update preferences do the work. -- Eugene Lee http://www.coxar.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/