On Oct 4, 2004, at 2:24 pm, Jim Freeman wrote: > Has Mail changed the way it organizes by thread? If so, it has only been changed to thread correctly. > In following the discussion about "iDisk size problem" I noticed that > "iTunes problem" was threaded together. This is because Colin / eleventhvolume posted his "original' message in the "iTunes problem" thread by clicking on a post in a different thread & clicking reply-to, before editing the subject. This is evidenced by these lines in the headers of his post: Message-Id: <BD856D79.6979%colin at eleventhvolume.com> In-Reply-To: <1C167950-14B7-11D9-8C85-000A95AA2492 at mac.com> So Mail.app is threading the "iTunes Problem" thread with the "iDisk size problem" posts because it IS a reply to the iDisk Problem thread (to Michael Elliott's post of Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:07:46 -0500, to be precise). On some mailing lists it's considered *very* bad for to start a new thread by replying to an old one - the two topics would not have threaded together had Colin chosen to "send a new message" to <x4u at listserver.themacintoshguy.com>. > I can see this being useful to group messages with slight variation in > subject heading, but it clearly didn't work in this case. That's exactly why this feature is in place. One might say it worked rather TOO well. ;) Stroller.