On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 09:36:27AM -0400, Cover, Chris wrote: : Eugene wrote: : > On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 10:59:13AM -0400, Cover, Chris wrote: : > : : > : The problem I had was in responsing to an email from this list. It : > : bounced back saying that the admin would have to approve of the email : > : because it was "too large." But nowhere near 5MB : > : > Okay, much better. The list admins have set up a custom rule that : > limits incoming messages to a specific size to protect list members : > from being overwhelmed by spam or otherwise large mail messages. It : > also helps to force list members to trim their messages instead of : > quoting a message several hundred lines long and top-posting with a : > "me-too" one-line response. : : Here's the deal. I replied to one of the 'opener" posts. : It was intercepted by the listmaster for being 'to large." Okay, you got a notice saying that the message is "too large". I follow you so far. : I just received a notice that the : email was rejected for "no reason given." Hmmm? Is this notice to a new message, or to the previous message? If the former, was it another reply to one of the "Opener" posts? : So basically it confirmed that the list is being moderated for : content in some form that is not related to the email server. The list software automatically rejects messages beyond a certain size. I don't think it does anything else like scan for naughty words and such. And I don't think this list is human-moderated in the sense that every message sent to the list is manually scanned, hand-approved, and forwarded onward by some human being. -- Eugene Lee http://www.coxar.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/