On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 11:46:03AM -0500, robert at elastica.com <robert at elastica.com> wrote: : : There are some classic quotes in this piece : : http://www.winsupersite.com/reviews/macosx_tiger.asp : : That isn't a complaint about Tiger, per se: It's a high-quality release. But : Windows XP Service Pack 2 (SP2) was arguably a bigger advance over the initial : release of XP than Tiger is over Mac OS X 10.3. My issue here is with : marketing, not with reality. Only Windoze sites still claim that WinXP SP-whatever is better than anything and everything OS X. Most learned folks in the computer biz have a healthy respect for OS X, especially top Linux folks. And lots of web folks cheer on Apple's work to make Safari compliant to the major web standards. The only haters are redneck Windoze lusers. -- Eugene http://www.coxar.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/