Yeah, I remember that post. It's even funnier now than it was back then. I don't think Ishan will be able to cancel those orders after two years' time. On 4/27/05 6:58 AM, Neil <Lists at mac.com> wrote: > Does anybody still remember the post from last year I'm quoting below? Many > of you at the time called it a pure fabrication, but that fact is now > obvious. If Jobs had a 3.2Ghz chip back then, we would have seen it by > now. > > on 6/9/04 7:19 PM, Ishan Bhattacharya wrote: > >> Think about it logically, after seeing today's introductions of new >> Powermacs. The only "new" unit is the dual 2.5 GHz and it includes water >> cooling and multiple fans which far exceed the need for cooling the 970fx x >> 2 chips installed. Other features, including the lack of a high-end video >> card, approriate PCI slots, a small single "slow" HD (for professional >> videographers and the like) all indicate that this 2.5 Ghz Powermac was >> designed to accommodate another chip, i.e., the 975. >> >> At WWDC, Jobs will introduce a 3.2 GHz dual PowerMac using the 975 chip >> which is being produced with reasonable yields at IBM's Fishkill plant. This >> model will have a $1000 price premium for educational pricing alone and will >> be actually available, i.e., delivered to customers after September 1. In >> addition, Jobs will indicate that a quad processor variant (with an >> astronomically high price tag) is under development and will be available >> within a year. The 975 chip in limited amounts has scaled up to 4+ Ghz >> although reliability/endurance testing is not complete as of today. >> >> In summary, today's release was scheduled for January, but due to fab >> problems, an insufficient supply of 2.5 Ghz chips was available and even >> now, it somewhat constrained. The mistakes make in the design of this chip >> were rectified early on in the design of the 975 chip-the development of >> these two chips were in parallel but not entirely synchronous. >> >> The current 2.5 GHz dual unit is a good value, but Apple is not investing >> much in advertising or offering "the best" in hardware (hard drives, video >> cards, memory, etc), all of which is reserved for the 975 dual 3.2 GHz unit. >> In preliminary testing, this unit using all of the various Photoshop >> filters/actions (not just the select few which favor the 970 series vs. the >> P4) performs at least twice as fast as the highest-end units available from >> large vendors. >> >> I have several 2.0 Ghz units and have ordered several 2.5 Ghz machines (but >> I get a huge discount :). However, I will cancel these orders when the WWDC >> announcement is made and get the 3.2 dual Ghz machines. I think the quad >> machines are going to be beyond my budget i.e., will exceed $7000 for the >> base machines for education store customers. >> >> Just a FYI from a devoted reader. Please do not share my email address, name >> or anything else if you publish any of this. You may quote me in part or in >> full according to your discretion. >> >> Have a good evening. > > _______________________________________________ > X4U mailing list > X4U at listserver.themacintoshguy.com > http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/x4u > > Listmom is trying to clean out his closets! Vintage Mac and random stuff: > http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZmacguy1984