To me, any lossy encoder is very audible. But I've been an audiophile since I was about 8 yrs old. I have a difficult time listening to anything recorded as MP3 or AAC no matter what the settings (unless it's background music). I believe the original poster wanted to know the highest fidelity way to record onto his iPod. David On Aug 14, 2005, at 3:23 AM, B. Kuestner wrote: > Before digging into super-fidelity technical details ... did > anybody ever care to make a listening test if the audible > difference after using a lossy encoder is even perceivable to your > ears, and if so, is this difference relevant to you? > > I read about Airport Express here which uses (sorry to break the > bad news) sub-par audio circuitry. Now if the Airport Express is > good enough for you, then most likely AAC or MP3 (VBR) both at 160 > kbit/s and encoded at "highest quality" should be more than plenty. > > Just a thought before you start filling up your hard drives for a > mostly psychological phenomenon. > > Note: I'm not implying that there is no perceivable difference and > that it isn't relevant for some. But AAC and MP3 are successful for > a good reason, because they really do a good job for a large > majority of the listening habits out there ... which should include > all AE users. (c: > > Björn_______________________________________________ > X4U mailing list > X4U at listserver.themacintoshguy.com > http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/x4u > > Listmom is trying to clean out his closets! Vintage Mac and random > stuff: > http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZmacguy1984 >