Thanks for your reply TjL Lists wrote: > > On Dec 18, 2005, at 12:47 PM, Jerry K wrote: > >> As I am going to get a new system with a PowerPC chip, I believe that >> Virtual PC is my "Plan B" to have a laptop that I can share between >> Mac OS X and Solaris 10 x86. > > > Ugh. It'd be better to buy a cheap laptop off eBay for Solaris. I'm not going to carry around 2 laptops when I'm on client sites. And I need Mac OS X + assorted OS X applications. > > >> My question is, is there anyone already doing this that can provide >> any hints or helpful tips? I already own an old copy of Virtual PC >> 6.x that I never really used. Should I try to use this, or will I be >> better off with the new Virtual PC 7.x from micro$oft??? > > > AFAICT there was very little in VirtualPC besides the fact that it runs > on a G5 (which isn't an issue to you with a Powerbook). > > My guess is that Solaris would run just as slowly in VPC7 as VPC6. > Most of the speed enhancements (I believe) take place in the "extras" > pack which Microsoft bundles with VirtualPC. > > Oh, and as much as this will shock you, those "extras" only work with > Windows. So running a non-Windows OS in VPC is a slower overall > experience than a Windows one. > > VPC also only works for Win2000 and XP. If you ever want to run an > earlier version of Windows, you'll be stuck with VPC6 anyway. (Not > that I would recommend anyone use anything but Win2k or XP if they have > to run Windows in VPC anyway BUT there are some programs which need > Win98SE and Microsoft decided to just end support for it. I have been micro$oft free since '93 and really have no need to walk down that path. There really just aren't any applications available that I need under windows as I don't play many games. I need a laptop for work. From the replies that I have received so far (total), it sounds like VPC 7.0 is not where I want to be. I will refine my question again to: I have Virtual PC 6.0. Am I better off with 6.0, or (assuming I could find a copy of 6.1) does VPC 6.1 offer any advantages again for me? Thanks to everyone for your helpful replies. Jerry K > > FWIW > > TjL > > _________