[X4U] Attaching A Router To Router

Juan Pablo jpablovilla at spymac.com
Mon Feb 14 10:12:48 PST 2005


I have to agree, i would use a switch, i theory you dont have to setup 
anything with it, if they are using DHCP he would have no problem, 
unless the ip assignment is made based on  MAC address, but thats not 
commonly used. I suggest you to tell your friend that he should try 
with a switch, buying a router its s waste of money for this case.


On Feb 14, 2005, at 2:26 PM, Richard Gilmore wrote:

> What I would use is an Ethernet Hub. Netgear makes some good ones. 
> That's
> what we use. It's a little different from a router in that it doesn't 
> assign
> any IP addresses but redistributes them from the router upstream. 
> Routers
> can distribute hundreds of IP numbers but typically only have 4 ports 
> on
> them a hub allows for more distribution of those numbers without 
> creating
> any of its own. I think they're a little cheaper than a router too and 
> they
> require zero setup just plug and play.
>
>
>> From: Allan Hise <allan at hise.org>
>> Reply-To: "A place to discuss Mac OS X for the casual user."
>> <x4u at listserver.themacintoshguy.com>
>> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:53:38 -0800 (PST)
>> To: "A place to discuss Mac OS X for the casual user."
>> <x4u at listserver.themacintoshguy.com>
>> Subject: Re: [X4U] Attaching A Router To Router
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, revDAVE wrote:
>>
>>> A friend of mine has 2 macs in his office -  and wanted to purchase 
>>> a router
>>> so that they could both be on the Internet and doing some file 
>>> sharing. ( I
>>> guess currently only one computer is on the Net -  the other is just 
>>> a non
>>> Internet Business Computer right now.)
>>>
>>> I  suggested that his company might already be on a Bigger master 
>>> router
>>> system ( there are about 30 employees) -  and he thought that most 
>>> likely
>>> there was some previous system set up and that he was already 
>>> receiving 1
>>> Ethernet cable that was probably on that system already - he wasn't 
>>> sure -
>>> but that is my guess. However, he still wants to purchase a router 
>>> to set up
>>> these computers in his room.
>>>
>>> So I am asking - is it possible to purchase a router and set up on 
>>> top of
>>> another ( bigger) router. Let's assume that the large office gets 1 
>>> T1 line
>>> coming and - and goes to a master router - and one Ethernet cable 
>>> goes into
>>> his office.  Can I then attach his private router to the end of that 
>>> cable
>>> and set up a " sub system " for his 2 computers?
>>
>> Yes, this is possible. I would try just using a switch (or, less
>> desirably, a hub) first, especially if the network uses DHCP (and the 
>> IT
>> guys allow the 2nd MAC address on the network). That would make things
>> much simpler, and cheaper.
>>
>> Otherwise, just setup the router to use NAT and the 1st router will 
>> see
>> the two machines as having the same IP address. Of course, this is 
>> easier
>> said than done and implementation depends on the router. And 
>> depending on
>> how the network is set up, you may end up with NAT upon NAT... (it 
>> works,
>> but can be ugly).
>>
>> So, there are a lot of variables. Seriously, see if you can go the
>> switch/hub route first. Is there some reason he can't ask the IT 
>> folks in
>> his large office?
>>
>> Allan
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> X4U mailing list
>> X4U at listserver.themacintoshguy.com
>> http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/x4u
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> X4U mailing list
> X4U at listserver.themacintoshguy.com
> http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/x4u
>




More information about the X4U mailing list