I hit reply so as to continue this thread hopefully I did that right. I've been guilty as well of hitting reply and changing the subject line thinking it would change the thread. I will try to change this behaviour in the future. I might not be using Entourage right however though because none of my mail from this list and others comes grouped according to thread that I can tell. Can I make Entourage do this or is something Mail does? It would make sorting my easier. Thanx Richard On 9/7/05 1:04 PM, "revDAVE" <coolcat at hostalive.com> wrote: > On 7/9/05 1:53 AM, "Eugene" <list-themacintoshguy at fsck.net> wrote: > >> >> These unique identifiers are mostly invisible to end users, but their >> effects are displayed as threads in mail apps. However, not knowing how >> things work behind the scenes, users think that threads start with a new >> "Subject" line. For the most part, that's what normally happens. But >> often on mailing lists, users choose to "reply" to a message and change >> the "Subject" line, thinking that this starts a new thread. However, >> mail clients see that users have chosen to "reply", which specifically >> means to reply to that message yet remain in that thread of discussion. >> So it maintains all of the necessary Message-ID in all the usual places. >> Even when the user changes the "Subject" line, it's still part of that >> thread. It's clearly a case of users thinking one way, and mail apps >> thinking another way. >> >> There are two solutions, both of which suck in their own right: >> >> 1) Train users to learn what "Reply" really means, and to better >> configure their mail clients to recognize mailing lists. >> >> 2) Add checks in mail programs so that if they notice users choosing to >> reply to a list message but changing the subject, then they prompt users >> and asking them to start a new thread or not. >> >> This is probably the only time I'm gonna spend this much time writing up >> something this long on this subject. Feel free to save this message and >> repost it when other people ask... because there will always be other >> people that ask... >