On Jul 18, 2005, at 3:44 PM, Stroller wrote: Maybe I am underestimating, but not having done it (installed Windows) very often, I have to ask... > About half of my work is fixing PCs for home users - the other half > being fixing them for small businesses. What you're not accounting > for is that the average home user simply isn't comfortable > reinstalling Windows - many don't even know how to back up their > photos to CD! As much as I don't want to believe that, I do. It's a sad state of affairs. > Installing Windows XP can easily take a couple of hours, especially > on systems a year or two old - many PCs are _still_ sold with > 256meg or less of RAM - and that's not counting Office, Service > Pack 2, internet setup, accounts for the kids &c &c. But all of that (except probably SP2) would have to be done with a new PC too, wouldn't it? > If I can take the computer home & leave it running - I back-up the > whole hard-drive and install any additional software in addition to > the above - And what I couldn't believe is that the first person in the article (with a Ph.D. in compsci) didn't have a clean image backed up somewhere he could restore instead of buying a whole new computer. Which he's going to have to do again in 6 months unless he's going to be running a different OS or doing things different than he has been. > There are so many factors that come into this, it hard to surmise, > but for machines of more than 2 years old replacement may not be a > bad upgrade. Like I said, if there are other reasons involved (wanting a faster computer), I can understand perfectly. My guess is that many of the people interviewed wanted a new PC for whatever reason, and the malware was just an excuse they could hang the blame on. But that wouldn't make the story quite as interesting. Purely MO. -Mike