[X4U] Mac Equivalents of Windows apps (was Re: Apple's move
to Intel chips)
Ted Burton
egburton at cableone.net
Fri Jun 10 07:45:53 PDT 2005
At 5:50 AM -0700 on 6/10/05, Robert Ameeti spoke about Re: [X4U] Mac
Equivalents of Windows apps (was Re: Apple's thusly:
>Every petroleum company uses PCs which then flows all the way down
>to their gas stations.
I have been in a number of oil offices where the PC sits on the
bookcase and the desktop is occupied by a Mac ... Some thought their
IT people were unaware that they had made the switch. Armed with my
Mac experience generated confidence, I remember installing software
on my PC myself, and having IT come around and be astonished the job
was already done. it's a whole different world there, with an
incredible lobby of sorts supporting it. IT becomes a kind of
priesthood.
The conventional wisdom in many fields is the PC, and for that fact I
give the credit to IBM's original PC which was 'economically and
politically correct' coming from Big Blue -- white collar, gray suit
folks knowing nothing about computers could simply say "IBM" as the
talisman of a correct IT decision.
And of course if you wish an application which will apply the
cultural equivalent of a left-handed wrench to the field of
Egyptology of the Hyksos period, it will exist for the PC. It will do
the prescribed task perfectly, but absolutely nothing else. The
Egyptologist wouldn't want to take the time to create it with Excel.
All that highly specialized stuff could safely be created for
something IBM started. IBM is forever, folks thought. Once started,
it has never stopped.
I was in an office one time that decided to go with Wang rather than
Apple because they could trust Wang to still be around. <sigh>
--
More information about the X4U
mailing list