On 11/27/05, net kat <netkat at comcast.net> wrote: > > yeah..we get that concept. 0.15 of anything you apply it to, and you > thereby prove our case: we are applying the % function TO 28.05, not > to 1.0! > > what appears to be broken in the calculator is the understanding of > what to DO with that fact in an algebraic expression. That interpretation assumes that 28.05 + 15% implies 28.05 * (1 + 0.15). Why? 15% is always 0.15 if you don't indicate "of something else"; whereas, 15% of x is always 0.15 * x. I didn't interpret the original problem, just took it at its algebraic face-value. And, that's how I'd want my calculator to work: explicit, not implicit. BTW, what would you expect as an answer for: 15% + 28.05? AFAIK, a+b = b+a. If your calculator didn't pass that test, would you say it wasn't broken? > > I guess there are 2 sides here, and "our" side feels that to say > "28.05+15% = 28.2" is sheer idiocy from any angle, the flaw being > that Calculator either merely converts the number 15 to a decimal > percent equivalent, OR Calculator assumes that you want to add 15% of > 1.0. > > Either case is logically incorrect. Again, we are not disputing that > 15% of 1 is 0.15. > > I'm old enough to remember a time when it was a huge selling point > for a calculator to have Algebraic logic built-in. Without that, > you're stuck with busting out the hierarchy of operations, > calculating each result, then adding the results together, which > almost completely makes the calculator worthless.