Zane H. Healy wrote: > Randy B. Singer wrote: > >>Which brings up an interesting topic. Mac users often wonder why Apple >>doesn't play up the "no viruses" angle in its advertising. Some folks >>speculate that it is because that might draw more attention to the Mac >>from virus writers. > I'm inclined to go with this theory. Having finished reading the thread you > pointed me to, and seeing an article on this very subject on Slashdot just > after reading that thread (watch out for line wrapping) > http://zdnet.com.au/news/security/soa/Mac_community_must_wake_up_to_security/0,2000061744,39210762,00.htm > I'm inclined to be a bit more paranoid, obviously there have been problems > over the past 7-8 years that I've been totally unware of. Maybe it is time > I invest in some anti-virus software for my Mac... I sort of started this sub-thread, in an oblique way, and I just downloaded the program Randy suggested, Virus Barrier X®. Might as well be as free from critters as I can _before_ I install a new version of MS Office 2004. Fence the pasture before you let the new horses out! I did a scan of my H.D. first thing after installing it, and the enture scan took only a few minutes, so it's fast too! A good selling point. keith >>However, I've done some speaking recently for Apple at tech shows, and >>I've found that the "no viruses" angle doesn't actually motivate a lot of >>Windows users to want to switch. Geeky Windows users don't really >>consider viruses to be a big problem. They just keep their computers >>updated with the latest anti-viral software and patches and they are >>pretty safe. >> >>Unsophistocated users of Windows are afraid of viruses, but I suspect >>that they would be afraid of switching to a whole new computer even more. > Things like this just amaze me, and don't doubt it in the least, especially > after the subject of viruses came up a few weeks ago when talking to a kid > we hired recently. He doesn't even run anti-virus software on windows, he > just reloads his system every couple weeks (that totally boggles my mind). > > As I stated in a thread here recently, one of my primary considerations in a > platform is security. Data kept on a computer that is susceptable to > viruses isn't safe. Furthermore, I don't have time to deal with fighting > the problem. That's one of the main reasons I still use a Mac. The other > being applications availability and my investment in applications. Of > course I also feel Mac OS X tends to be more secure that some "secure" > alternatives such as Linux, but that it isn't secure enough. > > Zane