On 6 Apr 2006, at 04:51, Robert Ameeti wrote: > At 8:26 PM -0500, 4/5/06, Robert Nicholson wrote: > >> What is protected about running Windows native on the same drive >> as OSX? Surely a virus on Windows is not restricted to writing to >> the windows partition. > > For the same reason that the Mac can not write to an NTFS partition > (the standard format of a Windows XP drive), the Windows OS will > not be able to write to the Mac partition (unless someone is going > beyond what Apple is providing.) Actually, a Mac can write to an NTFS partition. It just can't write anything USEFUL. If you put some data on an NTFS-formatted drive and connect it to your Mac (external USB / firewire drive, SATA or EIDE drive if you have a PowerMac) and type `dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/disk2` (you may need to change the "of=" bit to suit your configuration) you will see how easy it is to write destructively to NTFS-formatted partitions. Viruses that overwrite the boot-partition and make the machine unbootable are old hat - there probably aren't many for Windows as it was a common action of DOS viruses, and it has gone out of fashion as an unbootable machine isn't a great vector for continued propagation of the virus. But such a hypothetical virus would probably be quite easy for an experienced virus-writer to create. The question is: would one really want to target the dual-booting fraction of the less than 1% of computer users running Macs. > But more importantly, it must be recognised that just having a > Windows OS will very much make the user susceptible to every > Windows virus and spyware product that exists. Thus, that user will > likely have a virus on their computer within 10 minutes of having > installed the OS and connecting to the Internet unless they have > proper anti-virus software. This is just the reality of the Windows > world. Yes, yes, you're a Mac zealot. Very nice. I think we all prefer Macs around here so is it really necessary make this point? Stroller.