While Boot Camp is a step forward - allowing those who need it access to XP only applications they must have for work or games - the more secure and popular solution will be the one that lets you run XP or Vista in a window while you are in OS X taking advantage of the Virtualization hardware that is built in the new Intel processors. This $49 solution is about to be announced by a small firm just outside Washington DC called Parallels. <http://www.parallels.com> Here's the pre-announcement article published Tuesday: <http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm? newsid=5712&pagtype=samechan> -- Taylor Barcroft New Media Publisher, Editor, Video Journalist, Podcaster, Futurecaster Santa Cruz CA, Beach of the Silicon Valley URL http://FutureMedia.org RSS http://feeds.feedburner.com/FutureMedia iTunes http://tinyurl.com/8ql87 barcroft (gizmo) kungax (Skype) kungag5 (iChat-AIM) On Apr 5, 2006, at 9:59 PM, Clifford H. Readout, Jr. wrote: > I've been reading the traffic about Bootcamp, Windows on Intel Macs. > > The inherent Windows vulnerability factor does need to be addressed > by Apple > before I'll be convinced it is a good idea to allow it run on the > Intel > Macs. > > I've been trying to understand why it is a good idea for Apple to > do this. > Is it to make it less appealing for a couple of hackers to do it? > Then this > question came up: how many of you know someone who converted to > Macs after > being well exposed to the Mac OS? I don't know anyone who was > significantly > exposed to the Mac who didn't prefer its OS, and many, many of them > converted the next time they bought a computer. My guess is that > it will be > the ultimate showdown of the OS wars. > > It may be just in time, too. Those wars are becoming less > meaningful, even > for we fanatics, and before long, too few people are going to care > about the > OS, but only about the applications they need and games they want.