At 7:38 PM -0700, 4/6/06, Jim Robertson wrote: >On 4/6/06 7:14 AM, "Stroller" <macmonster at myrealbox.com> wrote: > >> there's no clear indication in your post >> that you need the Professional edition of XP over the Home edition. > >I know virtually nothing about the various flavors of XP. I bought XP Pro >for two computers in our office because I read something that said that if >there were more than five nodes on a network XP Pro was the better choice. > >If I have a laptop (MacBook Pro) that joins a network occasionally, but the >network has 8-20 machines on it, and I configure the Windows partition to be >a DHCP client of our DSL router, can it be running XP Home edition? Boot Camp can use XP Pro or XP Home. The hack of a few weeks ago must use XP Pro. If you are going to need to join a Domain (a workgroup that is centrally authenticated by a domain controller), then you need XP Pro. If you are just going to join a workgroup of computers (10 or less), then you can use XP Home. XP Pro has additional features that make it a worthy OS over the Home version. >Is XP Pro better configured to avoid infections? It is not Pro or Home but rather the SP2 update for either that is better against infections. >I've asked as many people as I had time to today about their experiences >with viruses and spyware. One person told me he had a computer on his office >LAN that Ad-Aware claimed to find 1400 spyware executables running on. Is >that possible? Sure it. They probably weren't all executables but rather malware files and registry keys, etc. >Hearing these stories, I'm amazed that people just roll over and accept it. They either must run Windows or they are scared to do something that the masses aren't doing. -- <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Robert Ameeti Reality is the leading cause of stress. <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>