Eddie Hargreaves <meged at earthlink.net> wrote: >On 4/22/06 12:05 PM, PoolMouse <poolmouse_nyc at mac.com> wrote: > >> virtual pc may be rewritten to use virtualization - but why should ms >> bother if parallels runs fine for $49? i'm sure microsoft will find a >> way to market a "better" vpc but i certainly don't see a need. > >With Parallels, you need to purchase a copy of Windows, right? So the total >price runs to at least $200. What if Microsoft bundled a copy of Windows >with Virtual PC 8 and sold it for $159? > >Eddie Hargreaves yes, you're right. i was thinking of clients/users who already own windows. thanks, don -- don montalvo, nyc curmudgeon at large