On 9 Aug 2006, at 16:29, Robert Ameeti wrote: > At 3:38 PM +0100, 8/9/06, Stroller wrote: > >> There's a very comprehensive license that's been written up by >> Microsoft's legal department on the side of an OEM copy of >> Windows. We have established that it's legal to follow that to the >> letter and install it as an end-user (or at least you have failed >> to demonstrate otherwise) and I contend that it is no more immoral >> or unscrupulous for an end-user to buy an OEM copy of Windows than >> it is for them to plant bird seed - as long as they are following >> the letter of the license. > > So if I deem to interpret the wording of the GPL license in a way > that I feel justifies my using the code in my commercial product, > that is ok? Um, of course. Lots of people do. This is a very and common basic interpretation of the GPL, and was intended as such. Your home router may very well run Linux. See <http://kbserver.netgear.com/ kb_web_files/n101238.asp> or <http://tinyurl.com/zbd4s>. You really do need to go & do some homework if you think this is relevant or any kind of analogy to Microsoft's OEM license. Stroller.