On Aug 9, 2006, at 1:34 PM, Stroller wrote: > The first is that - unless I missed it in the keynote, I have to > admit that I enjoyed it but didn't pay full attention - is that it > doesn't seem to be a backup so much as a versioning file system. I could be wrong, but I thought a second hard drive or remote volume was involved, which does imply a backup. Again, not sure, but it sounded like a full recovery should be possible from the other drive. I guess we need more info. -Mike