> > ... > > What are people thoughts on Leopard's upcoming features like Time > > Machine? > ><snip> > >I have two concerns about Time Machine. > >The first is that - unless I missed it in the keynote, I have to >admit that I enjoyed it but didn't pay full attention - is that it >doesn't seem to be a backup so much as a versioning file system. A >VFS is NOT a back up. What happens if the whole drive goes clicky- >clicky-clicky? You can't go back in time to a file which the disk >can't physically read anymore. HA! that was a pitch-perfect imitation... >But they did make a point of pushing it as "backup", and it would be >easy to allow the user to dump a snapshot to external media, so >presumably that's a feature. I think you're on target here. I gathered from the keynote that it probably uses both a versioning filesystem and backup to other media. The ability for Time Machine to use various backup media was specifically mentioned. <snip> > > The Widget-builder Dashcode looks great too, don't you think? > >Sorry, it just looked like a gimmick to me. I mean, you're not really >going to be able to edit a webpage with sliders, so presumably all he >was doing with that Dilbert cartoon was hiding the edges of the page >that he's not interested in. Whilst that's kinda useful for people to >knock-up their own widgets, it doesn't seem actually very "clever" to >me. <snip> >But then I'm just a cynical guy who doesn't really get along with >widgets. Yeah, I kinda feel the same way, but hold out hope that it will be useful for easy/throwaway type widgets. The wife is crazy about widgets... I use the calculator and Dictionary. Even the Yellow Pages widget is a very poor implementation. -- Michael J. Prevost Dot4, Inc. http://www.dot4.com