> The Mac Mini appears to support dual-channel operation, which does > indeed seem to be the same as "interleaving". They are not. Both features can work independently in a machine and be combined. So in the past you had machines that were only interleaving (old Macs and some old PCs, mostly servers). Starting with newer RAM-technology, PC-makers introduced dual- channels between RAM and CPU. This technology has a significantly larger impact. In many circumstances (larger transfers from RAM) bandwidth is effectively doubled. (Which is nowhere near the case for interleaving.) <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual-channel> So from the link that Philip provided we know that the Mac Mini can handle interleaving. But it also has dual-channel RAM access. The test I originally referred to was a PC of almost similar or better specs than the Mac Mini (Think MHz for the same Core Duo CPU). But in many benchmarks it did worse and even significantly worse than the Mac Mini. Main reason: The slower RAM bandwidth effectively throttled both the CPU and the GPU. Björn