Toni Lubofsky said: >I have been reading this list awhile, and don't recall having heard >of Apple 'Back Up' being recommended for normal backups. Is there >some reason this is not a good option (for those who have .mac)? In his book, Joe Kissell says: >Apple Backup 3 now offers very respectable capabilities and >a reasonable interface. If you¹re a .Mac member, and if you¹re backing >up to hard drives, and if you¹re the only user on your machine, >Backup 3 makes a fine choice, and you can get it without any additional >expense. (See the sidebar on the next page, ³Backup 3: A Big >Step Forward,² for more information.) However, if you don¹t meet >those criteria, you can get a better solution for less money. He has a number of reservations about Apple Backup 3, but the most important one is: >However (and you knew there would be a ³however²), despite these >significant improvements, I have a few reservations about Backup 3. >First, it still can¹t create duplicates. This is not a deal-breakeryou >can use any of dozens of other applications to do that, and some of >them are even freebut you¹ll then have to set up and maintain two >different backup applications. Randy B. Singer Co-Author of: The Macintosh Bible (4th, 5th and 6th editions) Routine OS X Maintenance and Generic Troubleshooting http://www.macattorney.com/ts.html