On 2/15/06 11:43 AM, "x4u-request at listserver.themacintoshguy.com" <x4u-request at listserver.themacintoshguy.com> wrote: >> From: Bill Bauldry <BauldryWC at appstate.edu> >> I¼ve been amused for a long time by manufacturer¼s claims for a hard drive¼s >> `Mean Time Before Failure` (MTBF) stats used in product data sheets. A top >> high-end drive company lists 1,400,000 hours MTBF on a new SATA drive. It >> doesn¼t take rocket science to analyze this claim: >> 1,400,000 hours = 58,333.3 days = 159.8 years! >> I¼ve never met a hard drive yet that would outlast me by that much... >> >> Regards, >> Bill > > You've never thrown away a piece of kit that still had a working hard drive? > > David > -- > David Ledger - Freelance Unix Sysadmin in the UK. > Chair of HPUX SysAdmin SIG of hpUG technical user group (www.hpug.org.uk) > david.ledger at ivdcs.co.uk > www.ivdcs.co.uk I've definitely dumped some good hard drives - in fact I've got a perfectly good PowerMac 8500 sitting unplugged under my desk waiting for me to figure out what to do with it. But - I know how the MTBF figures are calculated - and they are wrong. It's an improper application of "statistical independence" that gives the silly figures. Think of it this way: if the mean life of a computer is 5 years and the MTBF of a hard drive is 160 years, it should be such an incredibly rare event for a hard drive to fail that Norton, Alsoft, Prosoft, Micromat, etc., would never have gone into the business. Manufacturer's claims notwithstanding, a Google search gives over 2.3 million hits for "hard drive repair." Regards, Bill ______________________________________ Wm C Bauldry, PhD Professor and Chairperson Department of Mathematical Sciences Appalachian State University Boone, NC 28608-2092 _____________________ mailto:BauldryWC at appstate.edu http://www.mathsci.appstate.edu/~wmcb/ ______________________________________