On 17 Feb 2006, at 19:54, Zane H. Healy wrote: > ... > At the same time, how many Graphics Professionals work on > PowerBooks vs. G5 > Towers? Time is money, and I would have thought that the tower is > the only > way to go. You might be surprised. Although there are obviously some sections of the industry in which a few minutes shaved off production time makes a significant difference to the bottom line, I'd imagine that for many users comfort, familiarity and ease-of-use are more important in their day-to-day work (I pass one pre-press shop around here which, much to my horror, is still using OS 9!). For such users the convenience of having a single machine may be far more important than a few seconds shaved off the occasional graphics- resize, and the need for a laptop may be quite compelling. A laptop can be taken to client meetings and presentations, and if one uses it as one's main machine then there's no need to worry about synchronising files from a desktop; living at a laptop also fits the trendy "lifestyle" and allows one to work from home or Starbucks as easily as from the office. Personally, I don't have an office, unless you count a living room cluttered with computers, and I spend enough time working at home that I appreciate a comfortable keyboard, trackball and dual- monitors. I have a laptop because I can afford the luxury, so I can see that for someone whose preferences were reversed the desktop might be an expensive white elephant. Current Powerbooks can take upto 2gig of RAM, I think. Stroller.