Hello Germaine, You are indeed a little off-base on the color profile issues. Granted, it is quite complicated and almost every explanation I have encountered is sadly abstruse, but I think you can easily do better. The short answer to your question is Yes. The factory installed "sRGB" profile applied to your monitor will by itself poorly render the colors. I understand a profile to be a reference description of how colors are mapped mathematically. A profile by itself is fairly useless. However if your device, like a monitor or scanner, is calibrated, then the profile can be applied in a designated color space and thereby become visually and mathematically helpful. The sRGB color space of your camera is the manufacturer's way of providing a baseline indication of how the device's colors are mapped, an indication which can later be used by application and color management software for the interpretation of color. sRGB is the default Windows and Web colorspace. You can (and in your case probably should) designate that colorspace as a profile for your camera's image files, but without a calibrated monitor reference, the colors will be mapped in a visually unreliable way: you have not closed the loop. If you care about accurate color then you need to get sophisticated about calibrating your monitor. If you opened your image with its sRGB profile in three monitors side-by-side, then the image would most likely appear differently on each monitor if they are uncalibrated. There are numerous packages for sale with pucks that measure the actual colors produced by your specific LCD --at a designated color temperature and gamma-- and calibrate the colors to a known standard or gamut. Then the software will generate a device-specific profile which establishes a meaningful way for the color numbers in a file to be translated to the screen. If you do not have $200 to throw toward one of these packages, then at least go though the manual calibration procedure for your monitor (System Preferences... Displays... Color... Calibrate). You will generate a custom monitor profile that will then be used to more reliably convert the colors to your screen and retain pleasing colors. [However, once calibrated, you should not change your monitor's settings (generally 6200-degrees Kelvin and 2.2 gamma, as well as the brightness and contrast settings used during calibration).] For further information, Google "Color Management" and read more here: http://www.adobe.com/digitalimag/ps_pro_primers.html http://www.adobe.com/support/forums/main.html http://www.adobeforums.com/cgi-bin/webx?14@@.ee6b362 Good Luck. Others, please feel welcome to correct any misundertanding, confusion, or error introduced on my part. -Said On Wednesday, January 11, 2006, Germain M. wrote: >I bought a digital camera, a Canon S2 IS. Exif infos indicate an >"sRVB" color space. Some friends told me I could adjust the LCD >screen of my iMac G5 to the same settings to get exact color >reproduction. I found a color profile named "sRVB" in the "Monitor" >pref pane. I use it and I saw big difference the way the LCD is now >displaying the pictures transferred from the Canon. But everything >now has a bleuish tint. The grey around windows in Mail or Safari is >rather bleuish than greyish. Is this normal? I wonder if I understand >well the principle of matching color profiles. Could this factory >installed "sRVB" profile render poorly the colors. Should I have >another color profile. Or build it? Which I don't know how t do. Do >you think Canon supply color profiles? I need hints abut this. My >universe has gone blue.