As far as I can tell it makes a big difference if you try to use -N with -X... whenever I use -N without using -X I do see an incremental backup but if I try to use exclusions with -N it always does a full backup instead of obeying the timestamp of the file I'm using. Puzzled. On Mar 4, 2006, at 11:08 AM, Robert Nicholson wrote: > I also looked at the darwin sources to tar and saw that it supports > a filename as in > > /usr/bin/gnutar -W -v -p -X /usr/local/bruconfig/gnuxpat -N /var/ > backup/BACKUP-0 -cf /Volumes/External/BRUBackups/annie/ > backup-20060304-3.tar / > > but this also results in a full backup. ie. it's not considering > only those files that are more recent than the mtime of BACKUP-0 > > On Mar 4, 2006, at 10:10 AM, Robert Nicholson wrote: > >> It's actually using the following. >> >>> >>> /usr/bin/gnutar -W -v -p -X /usr/local/bruconfig/gnuxpat -N >>> 20060303 -cf /Volumes/External/BRUBackups/annie/ >>> backup-20060304-3.tar / >>> >>> What's happening at the moment is that the above line is actually >>> doing a full backup. ie. it's not considering the dates at all. >>