At 12:16 PM -0800 17/11/06, keith_w wrote: >nk wrote: >>Mac Write is a perfect example of an application which, (IMHO) was >>already completely "there" in the sense that it beautifully and >>completely fulfilled its mission (as a word processor). I wish >>they'd kept MW II around and had a version that ran on OS X, just >>like the MacWrite II of c.1993. >See: emailman-software-wordproc-mac at emailman.newsgrouphosting.com > >BTW. we both like MS Word 5.1a, but it's not compatible with OSX, >and quite likely it never WILL be... I have a client, a playwright, who finally switched to Word this year after I made him a bunch of macros, but until then he continued to write his plays in WriteNow, in Classic. In my efforts to help him, I got to know that program fairly well, and it is really sweet and runs extremely fast, of course (it's so small) in Classic. Of course, the fact that I can still run Classic probably already brands me as a budding Luddite! Anyway, anyone wanting "the old days" and who can still use Classic, might want to consider WriteNow as a word processor. As part of studying this thread, I downloaded MacWrite, but found that I could not run it either in Classic nor booted into OS 9 on another machine. The application would "unexpectedly quit" and it wasn't worth my time to try to figure out why. But WriteNow still works great. Wonderful little program. Daly ----------------------