A week or so ago I asked for some real-world reports on the user experience of Parallels, because my only exposure to it was mousing around on an Intel iMac (the one with the biggest screen; I forgot to check its RAM and its processor clockspeed) at my local Apple Store. I was surprised that it stuttered simply dragging an icon across the Windows desktop (within a window on the Mac Desktop; I forgot to see if things would be any different in full screen mode). Yesterday on Macintouch, Stephen DeNagy suggested a possible explanation. Here it is: > I have noted the slow-down of Parallels as well. My MBP has been tight with > Hard Disk space. When iDefrag was finally brought up to speed, I was aalled to > see that the Parallels virtual disk was fragmented to something like 80 to > 100,000 fragments (all over the disk!). I know UNIX is supposed to have > obviated this as a problem, but I think there has to be a hit when using a > virtual machine fragmenting itself on a host which is fragmenting on the disk! > So...I cleaned up, threw out and used iDefrag to do a total defrag. There has > been an impressive improvement in performance since then. We really do need > quite a bit of consistently open HD space for Parallels to perform at its best Most of the Mac lists I read have visited the defrag/don't defrag debate many times. This one user's experience certainly sounds convincing, but before I drop $30 on something that will tie up my machine for several hours, I'm curious what those more technically savvy than I would say about this. Ideally, I'd guess that some revision of Parallels that permits it to USE the Windows OS installed on a partition created by Boot Camp might be the best solution to this, but I've only heard well-placed rumors about that happening... Thanks so much, Jim Robertson --