On 26 Oct 2006, at 16:00, Robert Ameeti wrote: > At 3:26 PM +0100, 10/26/06, Simon Forster wrote: > >> On 26 Oct 2006, at 14:41, Robert Ameeti wrote: >> >>> Anything illegal will cost you more than on the open market. >> >> 1) I don't believe that the european directive covers the sale of >> second-hand goods. Ergo, the sale is not illegal. >> >> 2) "Street" cigarettes[1] versus legitimate cigarettes sold in the >> shops in the UK? Illegal cigarettes are significantly cheaper than >> their legal counterparts. > > Things become more costly when they are otherwise illegal to be > purchased. That may or may not be correct, the fact of the matter is that the sale of a second-hand iSight within europe is not illegal which was what you previous post implied. > When you can't buy a new iSight, the used becomes more expensive. This has little to do with legality and more to do with the laws of supply and demand. > In the case of cigarettes, you can still buy legal cigarettes thus > the traders of illegal cigarettes have to offer an incentive to > sell their illegal one, and they do this via a discount. The > illegal cigarettes are typically of an inferior (perceived or > otherwise) quality. Or there may be a risk involved. I'd suggest that you've turned this argument on its head. The fact is that the UK government imposes high duties on cigarettes which raises their cost to such a level that it's cheaper to buy the self-same cigarettes abroad, transport them into the country, sell them below the cost of "legal" cigarettes and still make a profit (good old fashioned smuggling). A clear case where the illegal product costs less than the legal one. Simon Forster _______________________________________________________ LDML Ltd, 62 Pall Mall, London, SW1Y 5HZ, UK Tel: +44 (0)20 8133 0528 Fax: +44 (0)70 9230 5247 _______________________________________________________