I believe that at lower bit rates (when you want to keep the file size as small as possible), two-pass encoding works much better and creating better quality video. The first pass gathers up the raw data and then the second pass has a better idea of how to compress the video. But when you start getting to higher bit rates (larger file sizes) then two-pass encoding doesn't improve it as much. This is due the fact that the encoder will have more bits to play with and have more room to breathe when it comes to encoding the DVD. I would do a 2-pass only if I'm encoding the video at less than 800 kbps. Otherwise, the improvements of 2-pass over 1-pass is negligible when you're encoding at 1500 kbps or higher. On 8/5/07 9:21 AM, alexandre <mac at kapellos.com> wrote: > >> >> Have you compared the 2-pass encoding to one-pass for videos? I >> have heard people say that they can't see the difference in quality.. >> :-D Wilson - Guam, U.S.A. - - - P L E A S E C U T A L O N G D O T T E D L I N E - - - You can bend my ear We can talk all day Just make sure I'm around When you've finally got something to say. -- TOAD THE WET SPROCKET