At 8:40 PM -0700 8/5/07, Randy B. Singer wrote: >You are absolutely right about this. This is a problem. And it >came to a head a number of months ago with a number of companies >banding together behind a new open document format to break >Microsoft's strangle-hold on the business word processor market. I >don't think that new format will ever catch on, but its formation >forced Microsoft to make its own new XML-based format an open format >also. With Massachusetts having caved, ODF (the Open Document Format) has been declared dead by one of the Linux publications, I fear they are correct. While Microsoft has submitted their new file format to I believe the ISO standards committee, it like their HTML products contain non-standard extensions to XML. >Just about every word processor on the market can handle the ".doc" >format, even OS X's TextEdit. But as you have found, some do a much >better job than others. I'm told, but can't confirm through >personal experience, that icWord >http://www.panergy-software.com/products/lp/we/gn_op.html >does an excellent job. There is a free trial available, and the >program is only $30, with a money-back guarantee. Interesting, this appears to be a document reader/converter rather than a Word Processor. Personally for simple extracting of text from a word document, I like Antiword. I have it installed for when I'm logged in remotely and need to view a Word docuement in an SSH terminal session. It might not be perfect, but it serves the purpose I need. At that point I really don't care about formating or anything. Zane -- | Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator | | healyzh at aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast | | MONK::HEALYZH (DECnet) | Classic Computer Collector | +----------------------------------+----------------------------+ | Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, | | PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. | | http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |