It's interesting that one on of the Windows lists I use, they are trying to say that it isn't valid because: It was too expensive (the next one on the list is $3499) They didn't do a full comparison (they just ran their standard series of tests) Microsoft doesn't charge for a .1 OS upgrade (don't know how it applies, but 2000 was NT 5.0 and XP is NT 5.1) Fanbois are bad no matter where you see them. cjc On 20/12/2007, at 6:45 AM, Paul Moortgat wrote: > The fastest Vista notebook is a Mac. See <http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,140583-page,5-c,techindustrytrends/article.html > > > > Paul Moortgat > _______________________________________________ > X4U mailing list > X4U at listserver.themacintoshguy.com > http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/x4u > > Seven Cent Deals - Great legacy stuff Great Legacy Pricehttp://www.drbott.com/prod/db.lasso?cat=Seven+Cent+Deal