you're right. they ARE angry. I have no fondness for predatory companies. I have no respect for them, and, no matter how many people like and use their products for whatever reason, I have nothing but contempt for them. your response seems to suggest an understanding why I might feel this way, and yeah, it is their business practices. to me, it's kinda like saying "Yeah, they squash innovation and step on everybody's neck, but gol durn it, cut 'em a break!" Also, when I consider the sheer financial might they have to bear on a project, the control they have, the way the table is tilted almost entirely in their favor, no, I don't respect the products they finally do release. contrast, for example, with open source offerings. there's almost no money involved, yet open source authors consistsently knock it out of the park. I feel that you are spot-on with your assessment of my tone, and I stand by it. nk On Feb 2, 2007, at 8:29 AM, Stroller wrote: > I don't like Microsoft's business practices, either, and I do object > to the way that our schools tie themselves into expensive licensing > fees for a platform that offers them no real benefits, but I read "NO > tolerance" and those words just seem angry to me, too much so to take > the comments at face value or find them helpful to a constructive > conversation. > > Stroller.