[X4U] XP <> Vista benchmarks

[Neil Laubenthal]

The summary is that Vista is slower than XP, even with all the fancy  
stuff turned off. Nonetheless, the author suggested upgrading because  
it was so much more stable and nice looking, unless you absolutely  
needed the fastest application performance possible.




On Feb 1, 2007, at 19:21, Neil wrote:

> The link worked fine for me too, but there weren't any benchmarks  
> on that page.  A couple pages into the report, the site started to  
> time out.  Can anybody summarize the 11 pages?  Is Vista faster  
> (when you turn off the new fancy stuff) than XP?  Is it slower than  
> XP when you enable all that stuff?
>
> On Feb 1, 2007, at 12:44 PM, Thomas W Noel wrote:
>
>> Link works fine. Check your browser.
>> On Feb 1, 2007, at 9:25 AM, Wayne Wilkin wrote:
>>
>>> link doesn't work!
>>>
>>> On Feb 1, 2007, at 11:46 AM, Paul Moortgat wrote:
>>>
>>>> For who's interested: <http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp- 
>>>> vs-vista>
>
> _______________________________________________
> X4U mailing list
> X4U at listserver.themacintoshguy.com
> http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/x4u
>
> Listmom is trying to clean out his closets! Vintage Mac and random  
> stuff:
>          http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZmacguy1984