I've been an online banking user now for over a decade. I began with Union Bank of California when I lived in San Jose, where they have local branches. When I moved to Santa Rosa, where there ARE no local UBC branches, I looked for alternatives and found none. Even the world's largest banks; e.g., Bank of America, didn't support direct online banking from within Quicken for Mac, because Intuit charges a separate license fee for each platform. My local credit union IT representative claimed a few days ago that Intuit's charge for this is $100,000 per year! I've been told many times that the actual datastream that flows in each direction in an online session (generating a QXF file) is identical no matter whether the user is in Windows or Mac (except that the software identifies itself as Quicken for Windows or Quicken for the Mac), and that the only justification for the separate charge is Intuit's business model to maximize revenue. A few years ago, when Apple's renaissance included adding Intuit's CEO to its Board of Directors, I thought we'd see progress. Perhaps the fact that Intuit continues to release versions of Quicken for the Mac is evidence of that, but they EOL older versions' access to online banking periodically so force users to upgrade (that's true whether on uses the Windows or Mac version). Intuit's booth at Macworld is usually pretty busy. I would urge all attendees to drop by their booth, and if they offer a chance to fill out feedback cards, make yours a reasoned assertion that Mac users don't deserve this second class citizenship, making certain you mention you're aware that it's not the banks' fault; i.e., it's not a technical issue at all, but just the banks' business decision not to pay ransom to Intuit to support the OS with a smaller marketshare. It amazes me that Bill Campbell can't be lobbied by the other members of Apple's Board of Directors to right this indignation, but perhaps that's why I'm not a business executive Jim Robertson --