I'm not sure what the criteria for "better" would be. Maybe smaller files and better playback quality, efficiency, not sure? Do they look "better" than QT/MPEG.x/H.264 for a file of similar size Mac vs. PC? Does a WMV "look better" than a QT/MPEG.x/H.264 on just a PC? On 17/1/07 10:45 AM, "Neil_ Pollack" <lists at mac.com> wrote: > I think QT is better on Macs, but WMV is better on Windows. I'm talking about > how well the files play back. Are you talking about compression efficiency? > > On Wednesday, January 17, 2007, at 10:04AM, "Richard Gilmore" <rgilmor at uwo.ca> > wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> My boss tells me WMV is the ³best video codec² out there. I don¹t really >> believe him but I was wondering about people¹s opinions on this. How good is >> QT vs WMV? >> >> Thanx >> >> Richard >> >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > X4U mailing list > X4U at listserver.themacintoshguy.com > http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/x4u > > Listmom is trying to clean out his closets! Vintage Mac and random stuff: > http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZmacguy1984 ---------------- Richard Gilmore Media Production Centre Faculty of Education University of Western Ontario rgilmor at uwo.ca In theory there is no difference between theory and practice... In practice there is - Yogi Berra