Thanks Neil. Valid comment. What do you recommend? R. >On Wednesday, January 17, 2007, at 06:54PM, "Rod Duncan" ><roduncan at telus.net> wrote: >>Thanks Eddie. Excellent piece. My initial thought was to use QT >>(H.264) and this seals it. > >Yes, but if you are encoding the file for the web, keep in mind that >there are still a lot of people running G3 and G4 class computers >out there. H.265 is very CPU intensive. There are other formats, >even QuickTime formats, that are much less demanding on the system >resources.