[X4U] Re: Hijacking threads

Andy andy.themac at gmail.com
Sun Jan 21 13:22:26 PST 2007


On 21 Jan 2007, at 8:43, Muckerheide wrote:

> Because it is, by definition, “wrong” when it doesn’t conform to  
> the mechanism built into the tool that they are using, especially  
> when the tool then fails to work as intended, whether or not to  
> their own detriment.
>
> As Wendy said, if you change the subject, be aware that people who  
> use threads (who may be useful resources) won’t see your message.
>
> And, of course, there’s nothing “wrong” with deciding to do it your  
> way (i.e., “wrong” :-), but info on why that might not work as well  
> as it could should be considered.
>
> And there’s nothing “wrong” with explaining it by calling it  
> “wrong.” :-)
>
> Regards, Jim

Can the above be applied to the practice of "top posting" ?
(Hope this is read as irony not sarcasm!)
And
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/pipermail/x4u/attachments/20070121/9994cd16/attachment.html


More information about the X4U mailing list