On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 06:53:58AM CDT, Stroller <macmonster at myrealbox.com> wrote: > > On 21 Jul 2007, at 05:16, Ed Gould wrote: >> .... >> I was in my doctors office today and I brought reading material (yea I >> know) a MACZONE catalog. I was looking through the server offerings and >> was struck that none of the MACS (in the catalog) offered anything about >> 32G (max ram). The one or 2 INTEL server machines offered 128G max ram >> (although most were 64G). >> >> That got me to wonder as to why Apple doesn't seem to offer 128G (at >> least) max ram ? > > I think it's a limitation of the o/s - I didn't think OS X 10.4 could > currently address more than 16gig, so I'm surprised to see Macs offered > with 32gig. Perhaps 10.4's memory space was enlarged when they released the > version for the MacPro? > > In any case, there are many other options of o/s for generic Intel PCs not > designed as Macs. Linux, the BSDs & Solaris spring to mind - I'm sure the > latter of these, at least, can address huge memory spaces. PAE (Physical Address Extension) is an x86 crap feature that allows 32-bit OSes (which normally see up to 4 GB) to see 64 GB of RAM. It's a modern-day DOS extender. -- Eugene http://www.coxar.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/