On Jun 1, 2007, at 7:34 AM, Stroller wrote: > > On 1 Jun 2007, at 07:59, Brett Conlon wrote: >> ... >> Finally trying to make the plunge from dialup to ADSL and was >> looking at >> plans for ADSL1 and ADSL2. I have the Airport Extreme base station >> and >> will connect through that and was wondering if it might be a >> bottleneck >> for ADSL2 and therefore would be a waste of the extra money ADSL2 >> costs >> over ADSL1? > > I doubt it'll be an bottleneck. > > Airport Extreme is Apple's name for 802.11g, which has speeds of up > to 54meg. There is some overhead to this so that real speed is c > 25meg, but absolute top speed for ADSL2 is about the same (22meg?). > > Most likely situation is that you're a couple of miles from the > telephone exchange & get 8meg or so, you're computer is at the > other end of the house & gets 12meg or so and your ISP's network is > the bottleneck at 6meg or so. > > Stroller. I totally agree, I have DSL from BellSouth (now AT&T) and I have one (actually 2) of the new 802.11n Airport Extreme Base Stations and a second one that I have set to broadcast in the b/g range to serve the other Airport Enabled computers that don't support the new n protocol. I get a transfer rate of about 8 mb/sec (mostly 4-6). There has never been any noticeable slowdown in transfer rates even with 3 computers accessing the net at the same time. The new n protocol is a true blessing, transfer is noticeably faster than on the g enabled cards. -- Tim Collier MacBook Pro 2.33 gig