This is nit picking but is anyone else bothered by the update numbering system? The sequence went 10.4.1 to 10.4.9 then now 10.4.10 But mathematically 10.4.1 and 10.4.10 are the same amount. They have the same value. The zero is redundant. But they are different updates. Can¹t they use a letter or something until Leopard arrives? Or could they use another numbering sequence? Maybe 10.4.91? Small thing that bothers me. Richard -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/pipermail/x4u/attachments/20070622/ac3aaf7a/attachment.html