This is nit picking but is anyone else bothered by the update numbering system? The sequence went 10.4.1 to 10.4.9 then now 10.4.10 But mathematically 10.4.1 and 10.4.10 are the same amount. They have the same value. The zero is redundant. But they are different updates. Can=B9t In the math that I learned, you can have only one decimal point in a number. Clearly, version numbers are meant to be strings and not mathematical numbers. (This reminds me of a problem that we had years ago with Novell IPX network numbers, which are normally written in hex. Some places treated numbers that looked like integers as decimal. Our fix was to ensure that we ensured that at least one character in the "a-f" range was in each assigned number.) Craig