At 11:19 PM -0800 11/15/07, Randy B. Singer wrote: >On Nov 15, 2007, at 7:54 PM, Craig A. Finseth wrote: >>I really doubt that an $800 PC is equivalent to a Mac Pro: the price >>difference in hardware is really not very large anymore. > >I gave you the link to the benchmarks given by the person who >created one for about $800: > >http://lifehacker.com/software/benchmarks/hackintosh-vs-mac-pro-vs-macbook-pro-benchmarks-322866.php Those benchmarks are just plain bogus. Am I the only one that sees a problem here? Mac Pro -- 2x2.66Ghz w/1Gb RAM MacBook Pro -- 2Ghz w/2Gb RAM $800 PC -- 2.21Ghz w/4Gb RAM As near as I can tell he also fails to mention specifically which Core 2 Duo CPU he is using. In any case, as has been pointed out, this is illegal, it is in violation of the Mac OS X licensing. Part of what I value about my Mac's are how stable they are compared to even the best PC's out there. Sure he's using good parts (close to the same parts I used a year ago to build the PC I use for a couple games), but it won't compare to the real thing. Good parts alone do not make for a stable system, coupling the OS to specific hardware does have real benefit when it comes to stability. Zane -- | Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator | | healyzh at aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast | | MONK::HEALYZH (DECnet) | Classic Computer Collector | +----------------------------------+----------------------------+ | Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, | | PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. | | http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |