On 11/24/07 9:59 AM, Crandon David wrote: > So where do you think that leaves me with my Dual Processor 500? Is > my computer essentially equivalent to a single processor 1 Gig? > Anybody in a similar situation? A dual 500 is not the equivalent of 1GHz. Processor speeds aren't additive that way, though they are cumulative to some degree. I used Google to search for an answer to your problem, and found varying reports: > Have a dual 500 Mhz G4 that was refused by the installer this AM, to > I guess older Macs will just have to chekout XpostFacto for help in getting > Leopard on their machines... > <http://eshop.macsales.com/OSXCenter/XPostFacto/Framework.cfm?page=XPostFacto.ht ml> to this workaround at xlr8yourmac.com (one of the best sites ever): > 10.5 running on 400MHz G4 Sawtooth: > > > " Leopard runs just about as fast as Tiger on my Sawtooth. > I tricked Leopard into working on my G4 400Mhz Sawtooth by installing to a > firewire drive on a PowerBook and switching back to the Sawtooth when the > installer asked to reboot. (After Leopard rebooted the Powerbook, but before > OS X booted, I unplugged the external case and plugged it into the sawtooth. > Then set it to boot from there.) > Went through the setup, everything. Runs just about as fast as Tiger. > However I have the GeForce 4 Ti and 1.5GB of ram, but the new screensaver runs > at about 1fps. > To make things a bit speedier, I used the Restore feature from Disk Utility to > move it to an IDE drive. Still works great. :-) HTH, Linda