On 5 Apr 2008, at 21:30, Ken Schneider wrote: > There is so much different advice about ethernet cables that I am > confused. Some people say that to get gigabit speeds you need to > use Cat6 cables. Some say Cat5e is OK and some say Cat5 is OK for > short runs. I want to get the fastest speeds possible. My longest > cable run is 25 feet. Do I need Cat6? If I need to get Cat6 cables > I will since they will be fairly short. I'm pretty sure that Cat 5 is within specification for gigabit - the differences between the 3 aren't really that significant. My laptop has definitely configured itself to gigabit when connected to 25' - and probably 25m - runs. You're unlikely to notice any difference between the three. > Also, how can I tell how fast my network is running? I've looked > for applications that measure this but haven't found any. Is there > any software that will tell me the speed of my data transfers? Honestly, this is unlikely to be important. When I was at uni - perhaps 7 years ago? - I had a friend who still had a 10mBit card. Instead of transferring in less than 2 minutes, as I had come to expect - CD images took over 20 minutes (and perhaps nearer to 30). Based on that back-of-a-fag-packet maths you can expect a CD image to transfer in under 12 seconds using gigabit, only for a DVD's worth of data are you up to 2 minutes again. You're pretty much maxing out a fast hard-drive at gigabit, so - overlooking any thing else going on in your computer - you're probably not going to be able to wrap TCP header information around it & still get it down the wire at the same speed. I think I've read of people being quite happy getting c 600mbps or 700mbps out of gigabit in the real world, although I don't know the details or if that's current. Stroller.