On 27-Feb-08, at 14:15, Jesse Leo wrote: > Some might argue that one monolithic database, while possibly prone to > corruption, is far easier to backup/restore and/or quickly move to a > different computer. Any thoughts? Sure, sounds like a great argument. Especially with Time Machine having to back-up the whole thing every hour. But once it is corrupted, it is a moot point, isn't it? I value my data a LOT more than Microsoft does! Dave --- Microsoft Windows is dominant because so many people in the world LIKE an inferior OS, especially since it keeps them employed.