At 0 13 -0600 1/1/08, Ed Gould wrote: >I subscribe to a *extremely* technical computer email list. Once in >a great while I post a URL that wraps the line. <snip> >One suggested I put "<" and ">" before and after the URL. I did that >and according to them it still violated the RFC. In other words they >are a hypercritical bunch and are of the type that do know it all >(sigh). I am *NOT* conversant in the RFC's to try and even argue one >way or the other. How would any of you handle this type of situation? They don't sound like a fun bunch! But it's strange that they would say to use brackets and then object. It makes me wonder if you did something I have seen from time to time: might you have put the URL in brackets but omitted the "http"? I've seen people trying to do the right thing, posting a URL like this: <www.google.com> Of course, that doesn't work, even though they used brackets. THIS would work: <http://www.google.com> Might that have been what happened? Daly ----------------------