On Jan 15, 2008, at 10:01 PM, Linda wrote: > On 1/15/08 9:49 PM, Daly Jessup wrote: > >> $40 per slide is not even remotely in line. Who was >> charging you that?? > > The slides were removed from their frames, immersed in oil on a drum > scanner, and we got Matchprints and .tiffs. > > I think this is a whole other ballpark from the links you posted. It > didn't > even occur to me that these kind of lower-end shops exist! > > $40 was the cheapest quote we got; other color houses wanted up to > $79 each. > > There must be a fundamental difference between those scans and > these; those > scans took about 30 minutes each to perform for us (start to > finish). No way > is DVD Your Memories working for $4/hour! :-) What you got was very high end/old school scans that are normally for companies that are doing color critical catalog/print work - jewelry catalogs, etc. I'm sure that they color corrected for that fee, too? I learned to scan on one of those types of drum scanners. While I am sure that your scans are of the utmost quality, I think that there are very fine scan houses that would charge way less than $40/per slide and you could still get very acceptable quality. Any more, you can spend $5000 for a Nikon slide scanner and get 95% of the quality of the drum scans for 5% of the price per slide. I remember working at a service bureau and there they had a high end Kodak slide scanner that was part of a process that would create Photo CD's. I think they had 3, 6 and 12MB versions of each slide on a CD. They charged about $2/per slide plus $14 for the CD. -- Nick Scalise nickscalise at cox.net