On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 11:50:09PM CST, B. Kuestner <kuestner at macnews.de> wrote: > > The MacBook Air appears to me as the "portable Cube". Very pretty, very > expensive. Both are/were worth their money, but still: expensive. The problem with the Cube is that portability makes no sense in a desktop environment where a computer, once situated, doesn't move around anymore. It was also more expensive than the equivalent regular PowerMac. While beautiful in design, it was for the most part a poorly-targetted product. In contrast, The MacBook Air is designed for the ultra-portable market where weight and bulk far outweigh CPU power and expandability. It is a focused product for a specific (and larger) target audience. It is not aimed for the desktop user, or for the portable user who really prefer a portable desktop (MacBook) or workstation (MacBook Pro). -- Eugene http://www.coxar.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/